Raul Valle-Badillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202119-73333California1,000 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAUL VALLE-BADILLO, No. 19-73333

Petitioner, Agency No. A206-673-051

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted August 30, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: IKUTA, BENNETT, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Raul Valle-Badillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, seeks review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (“IJ”) final order of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

to review final orders of removal issued by the BIA and review de novo Valle-

Badillo’s motion to terminate his removal proceedings and related constitutional

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. challenges. See Sanchez v. Sessions, 904 F.3d 643, 649 (9th Cir. 2018). We deny

the petition.

According to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.