Matthew Dury v. J. Ciufo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202120-15673California308 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MATTHEW JAMES DURY, No. 20-15673

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:13-cv-00595-AWI-

BAM

v.

J. CIUFO, Unit Manager, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Barbara McAuliffe, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Matthew James Dury appeals pro se from the magistrate

judge’s order denying his post-judgment motion to collect filing fees or forfeit

future collections. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de

novo whether the magistrate judge had jurisdiction. Allen v. Meyer, 755 F.3d 866,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 867-68 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.