Francisco Padilla-Lopez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202120-70990California516 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO PADILLA-LOPEZ, No. 20-70990

Petitioner, Agency No. A096-221-106

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Francisco Padilla-Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying relief under the Convention Against

Torture (“CAT”) and denying his motion to remand. We have jurisdiction under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.

Conde Quevedo…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.