Eugenia Paris v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202119-71130California699 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EUGENIA PARIS, AKA Jenny Paris, Nos. 19-71130 20-71024 Petitioner, Agency No. A026-823-395 v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of Orders of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Eugenia Paris, a native and citizen1 of Romania, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) orders denying her motions to reopen

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1 In her opening brief, Paris refers to herself as a citizen of Romania and also asserts that her Romanian citizenship was revoked. We do not address the issue of her Romanian citizenship because it is not before the court in this petition for review. removal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.