Baltazar Martinez Lopez v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202119-72829California336 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALTAZAR MARTINEZ LOPEZ, No. 19-72829

Petitioner, Agency No. A202-098-033

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Baltazar Martinez Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an

immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen and reissue a decision.

Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). law. Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and

dismiss in part the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.