Baltazar Martinez Lopez v. Merrick Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 17, 202119-72829California336 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 17 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BALTAZAR MARTINEZ LOPEZ, No. 19-72829
Petitioner, Agency No. A202-098-033
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Baltazar Martinez Lopez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order summarily affirming an
immigration judge’s decision denying his motion to reopen and reissue a decision.
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). law. Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and
dismiss in part the…