United States v. Yvonne Caitano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202121-10041California423 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10041

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00167-HG-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

YVONNE CAITANO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Helen Gillmor, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Yvonne Caitano appeals pro se from the district court’s orders denying her

motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i), and

subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Initially, the government is correct that Caitano’s appeal from the order

denying her motion for compassionate release is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.