United States v. Charles Ransom, Jr.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-50306California542 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-50306

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:10-cr-01236-R-TJH-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CHARLES DWIGHT RANSOM, Jr., AKA

CJ,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Terry J. Hatter, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Charles Dwight Ransom, Jr., appeals pro se from the district court’s orders

denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)

and motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and

we vacate the district court’s orders and remand.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). As Ransom acknowledged in the district court, he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.