Shannon Carter v. Brian Sandoval

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-16539California467 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHANNON CARTER, No. 20-16539

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-02064-RFB-EJY v.

BRIAN SANDOVAL; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Richard F. Boulware II, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Shannon Carter, a Nevada state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s

judgment dismissing his civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that

defendants violated his constitutional rights when they miscalculated his parole

eligibility date. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.