Raymond Bradford v. M. Voong

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-55216California310 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 20-55216

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02053-BAS-AHG

v.

MEMORANDUM*

M. VOONG, California Department of

Corrections and Rehabilitation, Director of Office of Appeal; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Raymond Alford Bradford appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various

federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.

Contrary to Bradford’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.