Raymond Bradford v. M. Voong
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-55216California310 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 20-55216
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02053-BAS-AHG
v.
MEMORANDUM*
M. VOONG, California Department of
Corrections and Rehabilitation, Director of Office of Appeal; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cynthia A. Bashant, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
California state prisoner Raymond Alford Bradford appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various
federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.