Randy Wiggins v. United States Government

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-55994California280 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RANDY WIGGINS, No. 20-55994

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-08309-PSG-FFM

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Philip S. Gutierrez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Randy Wiggins appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for lack of

subject matter jurisdiction under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). Serra

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). v. Lappin, 600 F.3d 1191, 1195 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.