Rafael Lainez-Urquilla v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-71714California350 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RAFAEL LAINEZ-URQUILLA, No. 20-71714

Petitioner, Agency No. A070-075-301

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Rafael Lainez-Urquilla, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to

reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

review de novo questions of law. Bhattarai v. Lynch, 835 F.3d 1037, 1042 (9th

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Cir. 2016). We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In his opening brief,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.