Michael McNall v. Pacific Ret. Servs., Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202119-17301California443 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MICHAEL McNALL; KARYL McNALL, No. 19-17301

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00889-LB

and

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff,

v.

PACIFIC RETIREMENT SERVICES,

INC., an Oregon corporation; REHAB SPECIALISTS I, LLC, DBA Consonus Rehab Services, an Oregon corporation,

Defendants-Appellees,

COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP,

Intervenor.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 14, 2021***

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Michael and Karyl McNall appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment

in their qui tam action alleging violations of the False Claims Act. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a

district court’s ruling on an attorney’s motion to withdraw. United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.