Michael McNall v. Pacific Ret. Servs., Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202119-17301California443 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
SEP 20 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL McNALL; KARYL McNALL, No. 19-17301
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00889-LB
and
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
PACIFIC RETIREMENT SERVICES,
INC., an Oregon corporation; REHAB SPECIALISTS I, LLC, DBA Consonus Rehab Services, an Oregon corporation,
Defendants-Appellees,
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP,
Intervenor.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**
Submitted September 14, 2021***
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Michael and Karyl McNall appeal pro se from the district court’s judgment
in their qui tam action alleging violations of the False Claims Act. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a
district court’s ruling on an attorney’s motion to withdraw. United…