Jermaine Howard v. Lucy Pearl
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
SEP 20 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JERMAINE JEVON HOWARD, No. 20-55959
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-05880-MWF-MRW v.
LUCY PEARL; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Jermaine Jevon Howard appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) his copyright infringement action.
We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v.
Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112 (9th Cir. 2012). We reverse and remand.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court dismissed Howard’s copyright…