Frank Miguel v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202118-72280California769 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANK MIGUEL, No. 18-72280

Petitioner, Agency No. A205-323-485

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 2, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: RAWLINSON and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and CARDONE,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation. Petitioner Frank Miguel (Miguel), a citizen of Mexico, petitions for review

of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal

of the denial of his applications for cancellation of removal, withholding of

removal, and relief under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.