David Fennell v. Rob Bonta
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-16487California333 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID DOUGLAS FENNELL, No. 20-16487
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-01522-EMC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as California Attorney General,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
David Douglas Fennell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his action challenging the constitutionality of California’s anti-SLAPP
statute, Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 425.16. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Watson
v.…