Chul Gong v. Westlend Financing, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-56082California414 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHUL HYUN GONG, No. 20-56082
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-05026-MCS-AGR
v.
MEMORANDUM*
WESTLEND FINANCING, INC., DBA
American Capital Funding, Lenders, A California Corporation; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Chul Hyun Gong appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law violations
stemming from a nonjudicial foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a sua sponte…