Chul Gong v. Westlend Financing, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-56082California414 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHUL HYUN GONG, No. 20-56082

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-05026-MCS-AGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

WESTLEND FINANCING, INC., DBA

American Capital Funding, Lenders, A California Corporation; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Mark C. Scarsi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Chul Hyun Gong appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging federal and state law violations

stemming from a nonjudicial foreclosure. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion a sua sponte…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.