Caleb T'bear v. Barry Forman

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202120-16348California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 20 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CALEB AVERY T’BEAR, No. 20-16348

Plaintiff-counter- D.C. No. 3:17-cv-00796-JSC defendant-Appellant,

v. MEMORANDUM*

BARRY FORMAN,

Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted September 14, 2021***

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Caleb Avery t’Bear appeals pro se from the district court’s order granting

attorney’s fees in this diversity action concerning t’Bear’s default on promissory

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). *** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). notes. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.