Albert Melikian v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 20, 202119-73088California324 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 20 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ALBERT NERESI MELIKIAN; NARINE No. 19-73088

TER BARSEGHYAN,

Agency Nos. A078-371-088 Petitioners, A096-154-743

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Albert Neresi Melikian and Narine Ter Barseghyan, natives and citizens of

Armenia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order

denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. Our jurisdiction is governed

by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. Bonilla v. Lynch, 840

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 575, 581 (9th Cir. 2016). We deny in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.