Pettie
Pettie v. Amazon.com CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I. INTRODUCTION
On March 22, 2019, plaintiffs Terry Pettie and Rey Borge filed a civil complaint
alleging various employment claims against defendants Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon
Logistics, Inc. The trial court denied a motion to compel arbitration brought by
defendants, and defendants appeal asserting the trial court erred in its interpretation of
various provisions of the purported agreement to arbitrate.
However, we need not address defendants’ claims of error based upon
interpretation of the purported arbitration agreement at this time. The trial court never
made a factual finding on the threshold issue of whether an agreement to arbitrate existed
between the parties. Without the existence of an agreement, there is no occasion to
consider what law should govern the interpretation of the purported agreement, whether
its terms are enforceable, or whether any other defense to enforcement exists. Thus, we
reverse and remand the matter so that the trial court may make a factual finding on the
threshold issue of whether an agreement to arbitrate exists.