Luna

Luna v. Penta Internat. Corp. CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2021B301660California3,454 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 9/21/21 Luna v. Penta Internat. Corp. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

PHILLIP LUNA, B301660

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC544985) v.

PENTA INTERNATIONAL

CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Elizabeth Allen White, Judge. Affirmed. Torhoerman, Kenneth J. Brennan, Jacob W. Plattenberger, and Steven D. Davis for Plaintiff and Appellant. Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani, Matthew G. Kleiner, Jason F. Meyer, and J. Todd Konold for Defendant and Respondent. __________________________

1 Phillip Luna appeals from a judgment dismissing his action against Penta International Corporation based on Luna’s failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.