Bernstein

Bernstein v. Sebring CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2021C088375California2,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/21/21 Bernstein v. Sebring CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado) ----

SCOT BERNSTEIN, C088375

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and (Super. Ct. No. PC20140070) Respondent,

v.

TIM SEBRING,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

Defendant and cross-complainant Tim Sebring (Sebring)1 appeals an order granting prevailing party status under Code of Civil Procedure section 1032, subdivision (a)(4)2 to plaintiff and cross-defendant Scot Bernstein (Bernstein) and awarding

A company owned or controlled by Sebring, Sheffield Properties & Investments, LLC, was a codefendant. For clarity, and because it does not affect our analysis, we will refer only to Sebring in this opinion. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.