People v. Mirsky CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 2021B297321California6,876 words

Opinion

Opinion

Feuer, J.

Filed 9/21/21 P. v. Mirsky CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF B297321

CALIFORNIA, ex rel. INTERINSURANCE (Los Angeles County EXCHANGE OF THE Super. Ct. No. BC211613)

AUTOMOBILE CLUB OF

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ALEX SEMYON MIRSKY,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Edward B. Moreton, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Law Offices of John T. Schreiber and John T. Schreiber for Defendant and Appellant. Wallin & Russell, Michael A. Wallin and John C. Russell for Plaintiff and Respondent. _____________________________

Alex Semyon Mirsky appeals from the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.