William Gilliam v. Mike Galvin

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-15308California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

WILLIAM H. GILLIAM, No. 20-15308

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:19-cv-00127-JAO-RT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MIKE GALVIN, AKA J. Michael Galvin; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

AIRBNB, INC.; AIRBNB PAYMENTS,

INC.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii Jill Otake, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gilliam’s request for oral argument, set forth in his briefs, is denied. William H. Gilliam appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his action alleging Lanham Act and state law claims. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.