William Gilliam v. Kathleen Watanabe
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-16939California429 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM H. GILLIAM, No. 20-16939
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:20-cv-00201-JMS-RT
v.
MEMORANDUM*
KATHLEEN N.A. WATANABE, The Hon., in her official capacity as Judge of the Fifth Circuit Court; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii J. Michael Seabright, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
William H. Gilliam appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging that improper decisions were made
in a state court action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Gilliam’s request for oral argument, set forth in…