United States v. Thomas Ramm
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202121-10143California310 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10143
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:19-cr-00016-EMC-
v.
MEMORANDUM*
THOMAS RAMM,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Edward M. Chen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Thomas Ramm appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for
compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Ramm challenges the district court’s conclusion that he did not demonstrate
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting his release. The district court did
not abuse…