United States v. Carlos Mejia-Quintanilla
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202117-15899California1,022 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
SEP 21 2021
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-15899
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 3:16-cv-03591-CRB 3:11-cr-00293-CRB-2 v. Northern District of California, San Francisco
CARLOS MEJIA-QUINTANILLA, AKA
Wilfredo Oliva-Castro, AKA Sleepy,
ORDER AMENDING
Defendant-Appellant. MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION
AND DENYING MOTION TO
STAY MANDATE
Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and IKUTA and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.
The memorandum disposition filed on August 30, 2021, is hereby amended
as follows:
Page 2, Lines 15–19: change with a mens rea of recklessness does not constitute a crime of violence under
the elements clause of 28 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), see United States v. Begay,
934 F.3d 1033, 1041 (9th Cir. 2019); see also Borden v. United States, 141
S. Ct. 1817, 1834 (2021)> to with a mens rea of recklessness does not constitute a crime of violence under
the elements clause of…
with a mens rea of recklessness does not constitute a crime of violence under
the elements clause of 28 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), see United States v. Begay,
934 F.3d 1033, 1041 (9th Cir. 2019); see also Borden v. United States, 141
S. Ct. 1817, 1834 (2021)> to with a mens rea of recklessness does not constitute a crime of violence under
the elements clause of…
with a mens rea of recklessness does not constitute a crime of violence under
the elements clause of…