Christerphor Ziglar v. Parc Dispensary

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTERPHOR ZIGLAR, No. 20-15746

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-04896-DLR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PARC DISPENSARY,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

JEFF SCHEAFFER,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Douglas L. Rayes, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Christerphor Ziglar appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). dismissing his action alleging retaliation under Title VII. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of

Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Dougherty v. City of Covina,

654 F.3d 892, 897 (9th Cir.…