Cesar Valdes Flores v. Grand Canyon Education Incorpo

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-16373California843 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CESAR GEOVANY VALDES FLORES, No. 20-16373

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05182-SPL-CDB

v.

MEMORANDUM*

GRAND CANYON EDUCATION

INCORPORATED, AKA Grand Canyon University; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

BRIAN E. MUELLER; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement detainee Cesar Geovany

Valdes Flores appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing for

failure to state a claim Flores’s action alleging constitutional claims under

U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.