Carmela Pedroza Alvarado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-70172California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 21 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARMELA PEDROZA ALVARADO; et No. 20-70172 al., Agency Nos. A202-152-990 Petitioners, A202-152-991

A202-152-992

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney MEMORANDUM* General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Carmela Pedroza Alvarado, Joel Cervantes Brito, and their son, natives and

citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision

denying their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.