Usaf
Broderick Warfield v. Usaf
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-17176California501 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
SEP 21 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
BRODERICK J. WARFIELD, No. 20-17176
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00853-KJM-AC
v.
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, 60th Security Forces, Travis Air Force Base, CA; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Broderick J. Warfield appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under
U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Pickern v. Pier