Usaf

Broderick Warfield v. Usaf

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 202120-17176California501 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

SEP 21 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BRODERICK J. WARFIELD, No. 20-17176

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-00853-KJM-AC

v.

MEMORANDUM*

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE, 60th Security Forces, Travis Air Force Base, CA; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Kimberly J. Mueller, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Broderick J. Warfield appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his employment discrimination action. We have jurisdiction under

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Watison v. Carter, 668 F.3d 1108, 1112

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2012) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii)); Pickern v. Pier

Imports…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.