Bulgo v. Munoz
Opinion
Opinion
853 F.2d 710 Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,765 Joseph BULGO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank MUNOZ, also known as Frank Munoz Martin, individually; Land & Construction Company, Inc., a Hawaii corporation; Paine Webber, Inc., formerly Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc.; Alex Lau, an individual, Defendants- Appellees. Nos. 87-2297, 87-2646. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 12, 1988. Decided Aug. 2, 1988. John H. Boone, San Francisco, Cal., James M. Dombroski, Honolulu, Hawaii, for plaintiff-appellant. Richard R. Clifton, Cades Schutte Fleming & Wright, Paul A. Lynch, Case & Lynch, Honolulu, Hawaii, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii. Before BROWNING, SNEED, and TROTT, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 Joseph Bulgo's second amended complaint set forth six claims of misconduct pertaining to a securities transaction against Frank Munoz (Munoz), Land and Construction Co. (L & C), PaineWebber, Inc. (PaineWebber) and Alex Lau (Lau). Numerous rulings were made by the district court and certain special verdicts were returned by the jury. The result is that Bulgo's claims…