Whittier Buchanan v. Gregory Ahern
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-16066California392 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WHITTIER B. BUCHANAN, No. 20-16066
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05167-WHA
v.
MEMORANDUM*
GREGORY J. AHERN; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Whittier B. Buchanan appeals pro se from the district court’s summary
judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging violations of the First and
Fourteenth Amendments while he was a pretrial detainee. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange, 888
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 1118, 1122 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.