United States v. Frankie Goulding
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10399
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00240-LJO-SKO-1 v.
FRANKIE THOMAS GOULDING,
MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Frankie Thomas Goulding appeals pro se from the district court’s orders
denying his motion for compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i)
and subsequent motion for reconsideration. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Initially, the government is correct that Goulding’s appeal from the order
denying his motion for…