United States v. Edwin Balero

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-10365California420 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Nos. 20-10365 20-10370 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. 2:99-cr-00401-JAM-2 v. 2:12-cr-00369-JAM-

EDWIN WILLIAM BALERO,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

In these consolidated appeals, Edwin William Balero appeals pro se from the

district court’s order denying his motion for compassionate release under

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We have considered all of Balero’s filings on appeal,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.