Rickie Slaughter v. Jeremy Bean
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-15335California263 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RICKIE SLAUGHTER, No. 20-15335
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01728-APG-NJK
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JEREMY BEAN; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Andrew P. Gordon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Nevada state prisoner Rickie Slaughter appeals pro se from the district
court’s summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging due process
violations arising from a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Furnace v. Sullivan, 705 F.3d 1021, 1026
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm.