Paul Beaton v. U.S. Immigration

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-16370California297 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 20-16370

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-02039-TLN-CKD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

U.S. IMMIGRATION, Sacramento Field Office; IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, Sacramento Field Office,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Paul Nivard Beaton appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional

claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). district court’s dismissal under 28 U.S.C.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.