Gordon Meador v. Ralph Diaz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-16760California257 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GORDON DALE MEADOR, No. 20-16760

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:19-cv-02116-JSW

v.

MEMORANDUM*

RALPH DIAZ; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jeffrey S. White, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Gordon Dale Meador appeals pro se from the district court’s summary

judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging deliberate indifference to his

safety. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo.

Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1056 (9th Cir. 2004). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). The district court properly granted summary judgment because Meador

failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.