Christine Baker v. Midland Funding, LLC
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-16218California376 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTINE BAKER, No. 20-16218
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:13-cv-08169-SPL 3:13-cv-08193-SPL v.
MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC; et al., MEMORANDUM*
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Christine Baker appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
her action alleging claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt
Collection Practices Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
review for an abuse of discretion. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. Liab.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Litig., 460…