Christine Baker v. Midland Funding, LLC

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-16218California376 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINE BAKER, No. 20-16218

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. 3:13-cv-08169-SPL 3:13-cv-08193-SPL v.

MIDLAND FUNDING, LLC; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Christine Baker appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

her action alleging claims under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review for an abuse of discretion. In re Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Prods. Liab.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Litig., 460…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.