Corecivic

Cameron Bell v. Corecivic

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-17081California459 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CAMERON BELL, No. 20-17081

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02709-JAD-

BNW

v.

CORECIVIC; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Jennifer A. Dorsey, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Cameron Bell appeals pro se from the district court’s

summary judgment in his diversity action alleging federal and state law claims.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion a

district court’s rulings on discovery motions. Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 1223 (9th Cir. 2007). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.