Azizi Ansari v. Felipe Martinez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 22, 202120-17435California394 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AZIZI ANSARI, No. 20-17435

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:20-cv-00164-RM-PSOT

v.

MEMORANDUM*

FELIPE MARTINEZ, Warden, FCI Safford; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Rosemary Márquez, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Federal prisoner Azizi Ansari appeals pro se from the district court’s

judgment dismissing his action alleging claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act

(“FTCA”) and Bivens claim. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We

review de novo a dismissal for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a).

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hamilton v. Brown, 630 F.3d 889,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.