Pacheco

Pacheco v. Tuttle CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 2021B302508California4,589 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 9/22/21 Pacheco v. Tuttle CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RICHARD PACHECO et al., B302508

Plaintiffs and Respondents, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. KS019694) v.

GREG S. TUTTLE,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Bruce F. Marrs, Judge. Affirmed. Paul Cook for Defendant and Appellant. Jimmy L. Gutierrez A Law Corp. and Jimmy L. Gutierrez; Pollak, Vida & Barer, Daniel P. Barer and Anna L. Birenbaum for Plaintiffs and Respondents. ‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗‗ Defendant and appellant Greg Tuttle (Tuttle) appeals from an order of the trial court denying Tuttle’s motion to tax costs and awarding appellate costs of $1,627 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.