Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst v. Louisiana Hydrolec John W. Marmoulides, and Samuel W. Ethridge Aqualec, Inc., Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant v. Aqualec, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant v. Samuel W. Ethridge, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant

Good Law
854 F.2d 1538·11 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1219·1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11569
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 23, 198886-5592California5,534 words

Opinion

Opinion

854 F.2d 1538 11 Fed.R.Serv.3d 1219 NILSSON, ROBBINS, DALGARN, BERLINER, CARSON & WURST, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LOUISIANA HYDROLEC; John W. Marmoulides, Defendants, and Samuel W. Ethridge; Aqualec, Inc., Defendants-Appellants. NILSSON, ROBBINS, DALGARN, BERLINER, CARSON & WURST, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant, Appellee, v. AQUALEC, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Appellant, v. Samuel W. ETHRIDGE, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 86-5592, 86-6424. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1987. Decided Aug. 23, 1988. Samuel W. Ethridge, Kenner, La., for defendants-appellants. Leonard D. Messinger, Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Richard L. Grimwade, Steven M. Cischke, Barton, Klugman & Oetting, Los Angeles, Cal., for cross-defendant-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before SCHROEDER * and NELSON, Circuit Judges, and KAY. ** District Judge. PER CURIAM: 1 This case consists of two appeals arising from a civil action initiated by Nilsson, Robbins, Dalgarn, Berliner, Carson & Wurst ("Nilsson" or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.