United States v. Ruben Duran Sanchez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-10045California933 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 23 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10045

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:18-cr-00220-NONE-SKO-1 v.

RUBEN GONZALO DURAN SANCHEZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Lawrence J. O’Neill, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 3, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER, RAWLINSON, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant Ruben Gonzalo Duran Sanchez

pleaded guilty to conspiracy to distribute and possession with intent to distribute

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). methamphetamine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 846, 841(a)(1). The district court sentenced

Duran Sanchez to 263 months of imprisonment.

Duran Sanchez appeals, arguing that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.