United States v. Robinson Clauschee

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202121-10016California453 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-10016

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-08149-MTL-

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ROBINSON CLAUSCHEE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Michael T. Liburdi, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Robinson Clauschee appeals from the district court’s order and challenges

the 16-month sentence imposed upon his sixth revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Clauschee contends that the district court erred by converting his unserved

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 180-day period of community confinement at a residential reentry center…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.