United States v. Demetris Dean

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202121-30058California314 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30058

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00022-WFN-

v.

DEMETRIS EDWARD DEAN, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Demetris Edward Dean appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying

his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Dean contends that the district court improperly treated U.S.S.G. § 1B1.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as binding and, as a result, wrongly…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.