United States v. Demetris Dean
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202121-30058California314 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30058
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:15-cr-00022-WFN-
v.
DEMETRIS EDWARD DEAN, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington Wm. Fremming Nielsen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
Demetris Edward Dean appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying
his motion for a reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). We
have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Dean contends that the district court improperly treated U.S.S.G. § 1B1.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). as binding and, as a result, wrongly…