Terrance Walker v. Intelli-Heart Services, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-15688California973 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

SEP 23 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

TERRANCE WALKER, ex rel. United Nos. 20-15688 States, 20-16341

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-00132-MMD-CLB v.

INTELLI-HEART SERVICES, INC.; MEMORANDUM*

DANNY WEISBURG; VANNESSA

PARSONS; DANIEL L. GERMAIN,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 22, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Terrance Walker appeals the dismissal of his diversity action against

Defendants Intelli-Heart Services, Inc. (“IHS”), Danny Weisberg, Vanessa

Parsons, and Daniel Germain (collectively, “Defendants”). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.