Karim Kamal v. Joseph Farrow

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-55065California349 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL, No. 20-55065

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01986-RGK-

DFM

v.

JOSEPH A. FARROW, Individual capacity; MEMORANDUM* et al.,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

DONNA FIELDS GOLDSTEIN, Individual capacity; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt

Organizations Act (“RICO”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review de novo a dismissal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.