Karim Kamal v. Joseph Farrow
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
KARIM CHRISTIAN KAMAL, No. 20-55065
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-01986-RGK-
DFM
v.
JOSEPH A. FARROW, Individual capacity; MEMORANDUM* et al.,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
DONNA FIELDS GOLDSTEIN, Individual capacity; et al.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California R. Gary Klausner, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Karim Christian Kamal appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt
Organizations Act (“RICO”) action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291.