David Jones v. Sander Brouwers

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID DARYL JONES, No. 21-55005

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:20-cv-07067-MWF-PLA

v.

MEMORANDUM*

SANDER BROUWERS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

David Daryl Jones appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 2000a action alleging discrimination by a car

dealership. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a

dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) or (b)(6). Colony Cove

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Props., LLC v. City of Carson, 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir.…