David Getzen v. Juan Romero
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-17241California268 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID GETZEN, No. 20-17241
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08066-SRB-DMF
v.
MEMORANDUM*
JUAN GARCIA ROMERO, Detention Officer,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
David Getzen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Erlin v. United States,
364 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of the statute of
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). limitations); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447…