David Getzen v. Juan Romero

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202120-17241California268 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID GETZEN, No. 20-17241

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-08066-SRB-DMF

v.

MEMORANDUM*

JUAN GARCIA ROMERO, Detention Officer,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 14, 2021**

Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

David Getzen appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging constitutional violations. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Erlin v. United States,

364 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 2004) (dismissal on the basis of the statute of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). limitations); Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.