David Dejeu v. Lewis County
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 202121-35018California483 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 23 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID J. DEJEU, No. 21-35018
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05176-BHS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LEWIS COUNTY; et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted September 14, 2021**
Before: PAEZ, NGUYEN, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.
David J. Dejeu appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing
his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action alleging various claims. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Colony Cove Props., LLC v. City of Carson, 640
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.